for PE / VC deal teams

AI claims survive pitch meetings. Most do not survive an audit.

MIT's NANDA initiative measured it: roughly 95% of enterprise AI pilots never touch P&L. When a target says AI, your committee has one question. Which side of that number is this company on? A deck cannot answer that. Reading the actual system can.

I open the codebase, turn every AI claim into something falsifiable, and deliver verdicts your committee can defend.

01 / the offer

Technical AI Diligence

A fixed-fee engagement scoped to one deal or one portfolio company, run pre-close or inside the first 100 days post-close.

For the deal team

An AI thesis with a build, kill, or rescue verdict on every initiative: what is actually wired to P&L, and what is theater.

For the company CEO

A 100-day plan: stop this, fix that, build this first. Written to be executed, not filed.

I get repo access and time with whoever built the system. You get a claims file that stays useful after the wire clears: reopen it at any board meeting and re-check every claim. Fixed fee, scoped before work starts, priced in the intake conversation.

02 / operator proof

Both sides of this table.

PE rollup, operated as co-CEO

Co-CEO of a PE-backed rollup: $1.5M platform acquisition to roughly $54M in enterprise value. I have been the buyer, and I have lived the operating cadence your portfolio companies run on.

Healthcare SaaS, built end to end

As fractional AI co-founder, I built a multi-tenant, HIPAA-aware post-acute care coordination SaaS from first commit to production: architecture, agents, evals, compliance. Shipped software in a regulated domain, not a slide deck about one.

A live auditable research system

130 tickers under continuous AI coverage in my own research system. Every claim sits in a falsifiable claims file with sources. Drift monitoring flags when the world changes. A locked eval harness scores the system, not my memory of it. Your diligence runs on the same method.

03 / methodology

The rubric is published.

Inspect the method before you pay for it. Hold the deliverable to it afterward.

  • Claims inventory

    Every AI capability the company asserts, restated as a falsifiable claim with a named source.

  • P&L wiring

    Which claims connect to revenue or cost in the data, and which are demo theater.

  • Code-level verification

    The actual repositories, read directly: architecture, vendor exposure, what breaks at scale.

  • Eval discipline

    Whether outputs are measured against a locked evaluation set, or nobody can say if the system works.

  • Data and workflow readiness

    Whether the data layer and operating workflows can carry the AI roadmap being sold.

  • Drift and dependency exposure

    What happens when models, vendors, or prices change, and whether anyone would notice.

Findings land as an auditable claims file, not a deck: every claim falsifiable, sourced, and re-checkable long after the engagement ends.

Sample claims-file entry (illustrative format; the full PRBot teardown replaces this)

Claim
"The recommendation engine drives a third of revenue," per the CIM.
Evidence
Order attribution over the trailing 90 days: 4.1% of completed checkouts touched a recommendation surface.
Falsified by
Re-run the attribution query at close and at day 100; the claim fails if attributed revenue stays under 10%.
Verdict
Kill the claim, rescue the pipeline. The revenue claim is theater. The event pipeline underneath it is sound and feeds two items in the 100-day plan.

Want the method at full depth? Read the sample teardown: my own product, PRBot, run through this exact rubric, warts included.

Read the PRBot teardown

04 / expansion path

Where this goes next

Some funds keep me on after diligence as an AI Operating Partner across the portfolio. That engagement is application-only, and it opens after a diligence engagement, not before. By then we are not negotiating trust. The claims file already earned it.

05 / start

Start a diligence conversation

This door is for fund-side readers: operating partners, deal teams, independent sponsors. Building your own company? Your door is the main site. Head to willmitchell.com

I read every intake personally and reply within one business day.